This case involves an attack upon annexation ordinance No.Territory Thereto, To-Wit: the Area or Areas Comprising (A) the City's San Jacinto Reservoir (Known as Like Houston), (B) the City's San Jacinto River Dam and Appurtenant Lands and (C) the City's New West Water Canal and the Right-of-Way Therefor Providing That Such Ordinance Shall Not Affect the Jurisdiction of the City of Houston Over Certain Territory Which Was Acquired by Virtue of an Ordinance Passed ApProviding a Saving Clause and Providing That the Inhabitants of the Territory Hereby Annexed Shall be Entitled to the Rights and Privileges of Other Citiizens of the City of Houston and Shall be Bound by the Acts, Ordinances, Etc., of Said City." "An Ordinance Extending the City Limits of the City of Houston to Include All Lands and Area Within Certain Limits and Boundaries With Certain Exceptions, and Annexing to the City of Houston All of the, Area Within Said Limits and Boundaries With Certain Exceptions Further Extending the City Limits of the City of Houston By Adding Certain Other Additional City of Dallas, ., 177 S.W.2d 231 Phillips v. 30A Tex.Jur., Municipal Corporations, Sec. The city, having power to annex the territory by ordinance, without the consent of the inhabitants of the territory annexed, the ordinance may be collaterally attacked only if the ordinance is void on its face.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |